Iannathedriveress
Random Heroine
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/illinois/article_ce1a393c-7b4e-11e0-b418-0019bb30f31a.html
Cultra has issued a statement on his tax deduction comment:
"I certainly regret my choice of words in the recent debate on Senate Bill 396. It was a tongue-in-cheek comment taken out of context - and should not be taken seriously. I am sensitive to the need to reduce childhood obesity. But I don't believe a new tax one everyone who buys juice, soda and energy drinks will accomplish the goal. Parents have to take some responsibility."
It should be noted that no one in the committee room yesterday laughed during or after Cultra's comment.
-Hannah Hess
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. An Illinois lawmaker says parents who have obese children should lose their state tax deduction.
"It's the parents' responsibility that have obese kids," said state Sen. Shane Cultra, R-Onarga. "Take the tax deduction away for parents that have obese kids."
Cultra has not introduced legislation to deny parents the $2,000 standard tax deduction, but he floated the idea Tuesday, when lawmakers took a shot at solving the state's obesity epidemic.
With one in five Illinois children classified as obese and 62 percent of the state's adults considered overweight, health advocates are pushing a platter of diet solutions including trans fat bans and restricting junk food purchases on food stamps.
Today, the Senate Public Health Committee considered taxing sugary beverages at a penny-per-ounce, in effect applying the same theory to soda, juices and energy drinks that governs to liquor sales. Health advocates say a sin tax could discourage consumption, but lawmakers are reluctant to target an industry supports the jobs of more than 40,000 Illinoisans.
"It seems like we just, we go after the low-hanging fruit, where its easy to get," said state Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford. He said the state needs to form a comprehensive plan to address physical fitness and disease prevention, rather than taking aim at sugary drinks.
Studies attributing the weight gain to liquid sources have made the beverages the latest target in the war on fat. Last year, 23 states proposed tax plans similar to the one presented by state Sen. William Delgado, D-Chicago, but opponents flushed them down the drain.
"We don't discount and we don't dispute the health factor," said Tim Bramlet, executive director of the Illinois Beverage Association. "We just think the beverage tax is actually the wrong way to go, and won't help the problem."
The tax would pose an economic threat to corn-growing farmers, companies like Archer Daniels Midland and distributors, he argued.
Health advocates said the tax would bring in new revenues -- an estimated $600 million annually -- to fight childhood obesity, improve nutrition and prevent disease.
"Currently, the direct health care cost of obesity in Illinois is over $4 billion, and that is expected to rise to $14 billion or more by 2018," said Elissa Bassler, CEO of the state's Public Health Institute.
The state senators said they want to explore different obesity solutions, before levying a tax.
-The bill is SB396.
Cultra has issued a statement on his tax deduction comment:
"I certainly regret my choice of words in the recent debate on Senate Bill 396. It was a tongue-in-cheek comment taken out of context - and should not be taken seriously. I am sensitive to the need to reduce childhood obesity. But I don't believe a new tax one everyone who buys juice, soda and energy drinks will accomplish the goal. Parents have to take some responsibility."
It should be noted that no one in the committee room yesterday laughed during or after Cultra's comment.
-Hannah Hess
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. An Illinois lawmaker says parents who have obese children should lose their state tax deduction.
"It's the parents' responsibility that have obese kids," said state Sen. Shane Cultra, R-Onarga. "Take the tax deduction away for parents that have obese kids."
Cultra has not introduced legislation to deny parents the $2,000 standard tax deduction, but he floated the idea Tuesday, when lawmakers took a shot at solving the state's obesity epidemic.
With one in five Illinois children classified as obese and 62 percent of the state's adults considered overweight, health advocates are pushing a platter of diet solutions including trans fat bans and restricting junk food purchases on food stamps.
Today, the Senate Public Health Committee considered taxing sugary beverages at a penny-per-ounce, in effect applying the same theory to soda, juices and energy drinks that governs to liquor sales. Health advocates say a sin tax could discourage consumption, but lawmakers are reluctant to target an industry supports the jobs of more than 40,000 Illinoisans.
"It seems like we just, we go after the low-hanging fruit, where its easy to get," said state Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford. He said the state needs to form a comprehensive plan to address physical fitness and disease prevention, rather than taking aim at sugary drinks.
Studies attributing the weight gain to liquid sources have made the beverages the latest target in the war on fat. Last year, 23 states proposed tax plans similar to the one presented by state Sen. William Delgado, D-Chicago, but opponents flushed them down the drain.
"We don't discount and we don't dispute the health factor," said Tim Bramlet, executive director of the Illinois Beverage Association. "We just think the beverage tax is actually the wrong way to go, and won't help the problem."
The tax would pose an economic threat to corn-growing farmers, companies like Archer Daniels Midland and distributors, he argued.
Health advocates said the tax would bring in new revenues -- an estimated $600 million annually -- to fight childhood obesity, improve nutrition and prevent disease.
"Currently, the direct health care cost of obesity in Illinois is over $4 billion, and that is expected to rise to $14 billion or more by 2018," said Elissa Bassler, CEO of the state's Public Health Institute.
The state senators said they want to explore different obesity solutions, before levying a tax.
-The bill is SB396.
