• Dimensions Magazine is a vibrant community of size acceptance enthusiasts. Our very active members use this community to swap stories, engage in chit-chat, trade photos, plan meetups, interact with models and engage in classifieds.

    Access to Dimensions Magazine is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $29.99/year or $5.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of knowledge and friendship.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access Dimensions Magazine in Full!

Items described as fat [and a mini celeb mag rant]

Dimensions Magazine

Help Support Dimensions Magazine:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sweet Tooth

Deep. W i d e.
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
1,277
Location
,
No, not "phat", but "fat". [And I put this here since I don't consider fat items part of size acceptance. :D]

Long ago, I worked in a beauty supply store. People often described 1 1/4" or 1 1/2" curling irons as "fat" curling irons. I'm all for truth in description. I'm fat. That curling iron has no fat on it whatsoever. Why do I care? Well, it extends to people as anything thick or wide or tall or big is described as "fat", because that's our favorite topic in this society [even if the person hates fat]. We start calling kids "fat" when they're taller or "sturdier" or just simply built differently than others, when they're not actually fat, setting them up for a possible lifetime of battling body image.

So, does this bug anyone else? What other items do people use "fat" to describe?

And what's up with those celeb magazines having "TOO SKINNY" plastered on the cover one month and "TOO FAT" plastered on another? I keep hearing how certain celebs are size 4 and described as "curvy" while the size 0s are accused of anorexia. So, what, only a size 2 is okay? Oy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top