I'm surprised there doesn't seem to be a thread on this yet. The New York Times, the british Guardian and the german magazine "Der Spiegel" have analyzed nearly 92.000 documents wikileaks provided about the farce in Afghanistan. Kudos to wikileaks, and no, I don't believe the spin our governments are already trying to put on this: that some of our soldiers might be at risk because of this (needless to say they wouldn't be at risk if they weren't there in the first place...). Wikileaks claims they edited any information that could actually endanger individuals. Personally, I like the Guardian's version best.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/war-logs.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/afghanistan-the-war-logs
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/war-logs.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/afghanistan-the-war-logs
